Vertafore's Dustin Pettit on AI Agents That Check Your Policies
Every agency has the same two chores nobody wants: keying policy data into the management system, and checking issued policies against what was...
2 min read
Nicholas Lamparelli
:
Nov 6, 2026, 10:33:37 AM
Personal AI agents can already gather driver and vehicle information, test coverage options and return quotes. But the final step, completing a purchase, still depends on checkout systems, consumer trust and licensed human involvement. Daniel Herrington, The Zebra’s chief AI officer, says the industry’s next challenge is building a safe, compliant path from comparison to transaction.
What are agents doing on The Zebra today?
“We’ve mostly seen personal agents doing the time-consuming tedious work that consumers hate, like gathering vehicle and driver information, testing coverage options for prices, and then reporting options back to their users,” Herrington says. He says The Zebra has begun allowing a small amount of traffic through infrastructure that lets a customer’s personal agent communicate with The Zebra’s licensed advisors, but agents are not yet completing transactions. He doesn’t put a number on agents’ share of total quote traffic, but says the trend is clear: “Over the past few weeks, I’ve been tracking our traffic closely as our data team uncovered a distinct, rapidly growing wave of automated personal agents navigating our platform like human shoppers, comparing rates, and completing applications at more than twice the rate of traditional desktop users.”
Why could a high volume of agent-generated quotes raise costs for insurers?
Herrington says more accurate, bindable quotes can require carriers to purchase third-party data such as motor vehicle records, which can cost up to $20 per quote. As a hypothetical, he says an agent requesting 40 quotes at $20 each would mean $800 in quoting expenses for carriers, although only one policy might be bought. The Zebra, he says, monitors its own look-to-book ratio and calls quotes only when a customer has a high propensity to bind.
Who is the producer when an agent helps a consumer choose coverage?
“We don’t quite know yet,” Herrington says. He describes a growing chain involving a person, a personal agent, an insurer’s AI and a licensed advisor. At The Zebra, he says, no transaction is completed without a licensed advisor. That leaves regulators and market participants to work through licensing, consumer permissions, disclosures, privacy and recordkeeping as agent-led shopping develops.
Should independent agents ignore, compete with or connect to agentic shopping?
Herrington says independent agencies may be able to ignore agentic shopping over the next 12 months, but argues that building a proprietary consumer-agent front door would mean competing with large technology companies. His recommendation is for agencies to connect to the platforms consumers choose, rather than build a rival personal AI agent.
What needs to happen before agents can buy insurance?
Herrington says insurance platforms need infrastructure that lets agents interact directly and securely, rather than navigate websites like human users. He says The Zebra is developing a Model Context Protocol server to give agents a more structured way to interact with its platform. He says the process must also verify consumer permissions, maintain records for oversight and involve licensed advisors where needed; fully autonomous shopping remains ahead.
Every agency has the same two chores nobody wants: keying policy data into the management system, and checking issued policies against what was...
Root and The Zebra Announce Auto Insurance Partnership Root Inc., a Columbus, Ohio-based insurtech company, and The Zebra have announced a...
Consumer AI assistants have started picking up the phone and calling insurers for quotes. Meta's Muse agent launched in the U.S. in September and...