4 min read

PDFs to Polished Data: The Hidden Costs of Manual Data Entry

PDFs to Polished Data: The Hidden Costs of Manual Data Entry

Picture a junior underwriter spending two hours re-keying a 12-page statement of values. Multiply that by 40 accounts a week and all of a sudden you have a giant chunk of their time taken by error prone manual processes. Not the best strategy if you ask me.

Insurance is a data based business and, for all of the technological advances built on data science, our industry still moves surprisingly slow. While digital underwriting workbenches and modern agency management systems have given us greater ability to leverage this data, the industry is still using manual workflows like the one described above. Not only is this time consuming, but it increases the likelihood of error. When data drives critical decision making, error prone processes are unacceptable. Over time, small inefficiencies compound into material financial, compliance, and reputational losses. 

But fear not! Low code tools and AI driven document intelligence are here, and they are surprisingly easy to implement and operationalize. 

 

If you are interested in learning more about streamlining data processing, AI driven underwriting, and more, we are hosting a webinar on June 10th covering this and more!

 

2. Where the Money Leaks: Four Hidden Cost Centers

First, let’s make sure we fully understand our manual data entry problem. Sure we all know that automating things is easier and faster, but seeing all of the areas where we are losing money can still come as a surprise. 

 

Cost Center

How It Starts Small

How It Snowballs

Labor Hours

10–15 minutes per doc

Thousands of hours annually; higher payroll or overtime

Error Rates

1% keystroke error

Mispriced policies, reserve inaccuracies, rework costs

Cycle-Time Delays

One late quote

Lost deals, broker churn, lower hit ratios

Compliance & Audit Risk

Misfiled PDFs

Fines, restatements, damaged carrier/MGA relationships

Opportunity Cost of Speed

Quotes delayed for hours or days

Slower quote times lower accounts won. Getting used to slow quotes means getting used to losing business. 

 

Why Traditional Fixes Fall Short

There are, of course, interim solutions that may seem less risky than fully transforming your data intake. Outsourcing or offshoring is one such example. While this reduces cost per keystroke, we still have the problem of error propagation, and the issue may even be made worse. 

When it comes to documents and forms, optical character recognition tools may help with extracting data from documents, but still require manual input in the underwriting workflow and often break on semi-structured documents. 

Maybe you have even considered building an in-house system to crawl form responses and documents, but the costs to maintain such systems is significant, especially as forms and templates evolve.

 

The Path Forward

The ideal solution is thus one that can streamline the entire underwriting data intake workflow in a way customized to your firm. It can use AI powered document intelligence to accurately understand unstructured docs and extract the right data to the right places. And it can evolve over time, all while being easy to implement, adjust, and maintain on your end.  

 

Collect & Connect

Implementing something like this in practice can be easier than you might think. First, start with your data intake. Two things need to be considered when updating your intake system; the user experience itself, and how the data is collected on the back end. We have all experienced clunky forms, so you should know that the look and feel of the form is surprisingly important. Don't make your customers use a user interface that feels like the DMV, use a modern form builder. Modern form builders like Typeform and Feathery are also easy to embed or can live on their own as a web application. They also tend to have out of the box integrations that make connecting the data to other systems a breeze. 

While I like Typeform as a longtime user, a product like Feathery has an edge in that it features AI driven document intelligence. Sure, you could build a custom system integrating another document reading tool, but at that point you’re starting to overcomplicate things. Having the ability to pull data from unstructured documents within the same tool your forms and workflows are built on is just simple and effective. 

With data being collected from form responses and documents, we arrive at the critical step; routing the data. Since we are looking to reduce or eliminate the process of manual data entry, connecting this data to the right places in your workflows is the real key to success. This might take some setup time, but don't be intimidated; it’s a lot more straightforward than it sounds.

 

Implementation Checklist – Turning Data Chaos into Clicks

  1. Pinpoint the Pain
    Grab one workflow that drives everyone crazy—renewal apps, loss-run uploads, broker quote requests. If it hurts the most, start there.
  2. Map the Journey
    Sketch (yes, on paper) where each field of data needs to land: rating engine, policy admin, CRM, data lake. Seeing the flow on one page keeps tech chatter from spiraling.
  3. Drop In a Modern Form Builder
    Spin up a Feathery (or comparable) form that mirrors your existing PDF—but cleaner. Use conditional logic so applicants only see questions that matter to them.
  4. Turn On AI Document Capture
    Point Feathery’s doc-intelligence at the supporting PDFs. Check the confidence scores; add a “human review” step for any field under, say, 95 %. Now the machine does the grunt work, and your team just sanity-checks the low-confidence scraps.
  5. Wire It All Together
    Use the platform’s native connectors—or a quick Zapier/Make flow—to ship that polished JSON into Guidewire, Duck Creek, or your home-grown rating API. No swivel-chair re-keying allowed.
  6. Train the Front Line
    Underwriters and assistants get a 30-minute demo: where to find exceptions, how to override a field, and who to ping if something looks odd. Keep the playbook to one page—anything longer won’t get read.
  7. Measure, Rinse, Repeat
    Track three numbers: turnaround time, error rate, and cost per submission. Revisit after 30 days. If the graph bends the right way, pick the next pain point and run the same play.

Conclusion

Manual data entry is the slow leak no one notices until the floorboards warp—lost hours, hidden errors, deals that die on someone else’s desk. Low-code platforms with baked-in AI, like Feathery, patch the hole and lay fresh flooring in one move: sleek forms up front, clean structured data out back, and a workflow that actually keeps pace with your business ambitions. Start small, wire it tight, and watch those “tiny” inefficiencies stop snowballing into seven-figure headaches. Your underwriters—and your bottom line—will thank you.

 

As a reminder: If you are interested in learning more about streamlining data processing, AI driven underwriting, and more innovations, we are hosting a webinar on June 10th featuring insights from Feathery and Next Insurance.

More Data Is Not Better…Better Data Is Better – Debunking The Myth That More Data & Technology Will Obsolete Insurance

5 min read

More Data Is Not Better…Better Data Is Better – Debunking The Myth That More Data & Technology Will Obsolete Insurance

More Data Is Not Better…Better Data Is Better – Debunking The Myth That More Data & Technology Will Obsolete Insurance by Nicholas Lamparelli

Read More
Low-Code, Big Impact: Accelerating Digital Transformation in Insurance

3 min read

Low-Code, Big Impact: Accelerating Digital Transformation in Insurance

The amount that I despise the overuse of corporate jargon and industry buzzwords is complicated by the fact that I use them… a lot. And with that...

Read More
Autonomous Vehicles are Bringing the “Trolley Problem” to Life

2 min read

Autonomous Vehicles are Bringing the “Trolley Problem” to Life

Autonomous Vehicles are Bringing the “Trolley Problem” to Life by Gabriela Smith There’s an old familiar moral twister that used to be taught...

Read More